Disulfide rich peptides have gained significant attention recently due to their incredible biological stability and tolerance to epitope grafting. This class of peptides is often folded in solution, assuming the desired disulfide bond pattern correlates with the most thermodynamically stable structure. Sometimes though, especially for chemically synthesized cysteine rich peptides, this is not the case. The result is a complex mixture of peptides with varying disulfide bonding patterns and identical mass.
Using pairs of cysteine residues with matched orthogonal side chain protecting groups during chemical synthesis allows for precise regioselective control of the disulfide bond pattern on-resin, potentially simplifying final purification steps. In today’s post, I’ll explore conditions for removing acetamidomethyl (Acm) protecting groups with simultaneous disulfide bond formation.
I’ve been working lately with the cysteine rich peptide apamin, an 18 amino acid peptide found in bee venom whose structure is controlled by two disulfide bonds, Figure 1. My goal was to not only synthesize the linear peptide, but also form both disulfide bonds on resin with regioselective control. In my planning, I first had to decide which cysteine variants to use. For this peptide I decided on pairing Fmoc-Cys(Mmt)-OH and Fmoc-Cys(Acm)-OH residues.
I have already optimized removing an Mmt protecting group for some work I did with oxytocin, making this an ideal choice for one disulfide bond. Acm protected cysteine is also commonly used for on-resin disulfide bond formation, so this was an easy second choice. Conveniently, the Acm protecting group can be removed and disulfide bond formed in a single reaction step.
There are several strategies that can be used both in solution as well as on-resin to remove Acm protecting groups. I decided to use iodine-mediated Acm removal and concommitant cysteine oxidation to simplify the automation process.
I synthesized apamin and formed the first disulfide bond – in this case between Cys 1 and 11 – using the Branches™ software feature on my Biotage® Initiator+ Alstra™ on 0.5 mmol scale in order to efficiently determine an automated Acm removal protocol, Figure 2.
While the linear synthesis isn’t as clean as I’ve seen in previous attempts, the desired peptide product is still relatively abundant, so I decided to move forward with the on-resin Acm removal.
My literature search turned up protocols using anywhere from 10-15 iodine equivalents relative to the resin reacting for 40-60 min. Given that apamin is already constrained by a single disulfide bond, I started with 15 equivalents of iodine for 60 min at room temperature, varying both reaction time and iodine equivalents, Table 1.
Trial | Reaction time (min) | I2 equivalents |
1 | 60 | 15 |
2 | 45 | 15 |
3 | 30 | 15 |
4 | 60 | 10 |
5 | 60 | 5 |
6 | 60 | 2.5 |
Well, that’s interesting. I had hoped to find some conditions that didn’t fully convert the free sulfhydryls to cystine, but that doesn’t appear to be the case for this peptide and the conditions evaluated, Figure 3.
While it certainly wasn’t an exhaustive condition profile, I still think there is something to learn here. For the case of apamin, a preformed disulfide bond between residues 1 and 11 likely induces a conformation positioning the remaining two cysteine residues in close proximity to each other increasing the local concentration and therefore reaction kinetics of the disulfide bond formation, Figure 4. Interestingly, in my hands, it doesn’t seem to matter which disulfide bond is formed first (data not shown). This is certainly not the case for all disulfide rich peptides.
I’ll definitely be working on some different conditions for on-resin disulfide synthesis, so stay tuned for additional conditions applied to more peptides.
If you would like to learn more about simplifying synthesis and purification of your complex peptides, follow the link below.