Shopping Cart (Login required)
2013 web banners8

Automated vs. Manual Sample Preparation in Forensic Toxicology

27 September 2016

Recovery profiles from manual and automated supported liquid extraction protocols were put side by side in a study on drugs of abuse in blood and urine matrices.

 

Data reliability in forensic toxicology is of paramount importance. The possibility of false positives and/or false negatives can have wide ranging consequences and impacts decisions on various parts of the analytical method development process. A poster presented at TIAFT 2016 in Brisbane, Australia, compares the performance of manual processing to a novel automated sample preparation system prior to GC/MS or LC-MS/MS analysis, putting emphasis on the potential for 96-well cross contamination and strategies for its elimination.

Conclusions

  • This poster describes effective use of a novel sample preparation system for both column and 96-well plate format and strategies for the elimination of cross contamination.
  • Analyte volatility is a key component to the potential for cross contamination.
  • Evaporative cross contamination can be affected by gas flow, temperature, nozzle height and solvent properties.
  • The Biotage® ACT plate has proved effective for reducing or eliminating evaporative cross contamination as shown by the analyte “hot spot” experiments.
  • The Extrahera automated sample preparation platform functions with 24-column and 96-well arrangement for the adaptation of manual extraction methods.

Download the poster below.